🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined an organized professional network test recently following popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Method

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were more personal - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive outcomes. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."